Case 1307002/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Dragan v Shaftec Automotive Components Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1307002/2024
- Decision date
- 29 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner Approved
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short withdrawal order rather than a merits decision. It dismisses the complaints identified in paragraphs 1.1 to 1.3 after the claimant confirmed that he did not wish to reserve the right to bring any further claim in relation to those matters. Those complaints were described as any complaint against AXA Insurance and/or Dr Shamin Rahman, any complaint of breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, and any complaint of negligence by the respondent.
The complaint of unfair dismissal was also dismissed following withdrawal. In relation to that complaint, the claimant confirmed that he had not been dismissed by the respondent and remained in its employment. The judgment states that the remaining complaints were unaffected by the order.
No liability findings on the merits and no monetary remedy were recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Dismissed following withdrawal; the claimant confirmed that he did not wish to reserve the right to bring any such further claim. The judgment describes this as any complaint against AXA Insurance and/or Dr Shamin Rahman. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Dismissed following withdrawal; the claimant confirmed that he did not wish to reserve the right to bring any such further claim. The judgment describes this as any complaint of breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Dismissed following withdrawal; the claimant confirmed that he did not wish to reserve the right to bring any such further claim. The judgment describes this as any complaint of negligence by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following withdrawal. The claimant confirmed that he had not been dismissed by the respondent and remained in its employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.