Case 1307009/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Seivewright v NHS Midlands and Lancashire CSU — 2022
- Case reference
- 1307009/2020
- Decision date
- 15 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
- Panel members
- Ms K Ahmad, Mr P Tsouvallaris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Seivewright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the Respondent did not contravene section 39 of the Equality Act 2010 by directly discriminating against Mrs A Seivewright because of her son’s disability during a conversation on 20 March 2020. That complaint was dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent did not dismiss the Claimant. As a result, it rejected the linked complaint that the Respondent had directly discriminated against her because of her son’s disability by dismissing her. That complaint was also dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the alleged discrimination was because of the Claimant's son’s disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment found that the Respondent did not dismiss the Claimant, so the related direct discrimination complaint based on her son’s disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 39 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.