Case 1307218/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mrs Akhter - Director — 2020
- Case reference
- 1307218/2019
- Decision date
- 4 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Birmingham on 4 February 2020 before Employment Judge Self, determined two monetary claims brought by Mrs K Szymanowicz against Flexible Learning Limited. It declared that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages in the gross sum of £1,329.20 and ordered payment of that sum subject to appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been underpaid holiday pay and was owed £449.85, again payable subject to appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance. The judgment records no further disputed issues or findings beyond these two payments.
The total sum payable under the judgment was £1,779.05 gross less appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages in the gross sum of £1,329.20, payable with appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,329 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the claimant had been underpaid in respect of holiday pay and was owed £449.85, payable with appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £450 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,779
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.