Case 1307238/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Walker v Boots Management Services Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1307238/2019
- Decision date
- 16 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Walker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 10 June 2020, Employment Judge Camp held that none of Mrs D Walker's complaints had been brought out of time. The hearing was held in public by Skype, with the claimant appearing in person and Boots Management Services Limited represented by a solicitor. Reasons were given orally, with written reasons to follow.
On the unfair dismissal complaint, the tribunal applied section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and found it was not reasonably practicable for the complaint to be presented before the end of the primary limitation period plus the early conciliation extension, and that it was presented within a further period the tribunal considered reasonable. On the discrimination complaints, the tribunal applied section 123 of the Equality Act 2010 and held that although the proceedings were brought after the primary period plus the early conciliation extension, it was just and equitable to extend time so that they were not out of time. The judgment did not decide the substantive merits of the claims and did not make any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary time-limit issue decided in the claimant's favour under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable to present the complaint within the ordinary period and that it was presented within a further reasonable period. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary time-limit issue decided in the claimant's favour under section 123 of the Equality Act 2010; the tribunal extended time on a just and equitable basis and held the discrimination proceedings were not out of time. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.111 ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable period
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.