Case 1307289/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Woods v Focused Security Services Ltd and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1307289/2019
- Decision date
- 12 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Signed
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr D Woods
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 23 June 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr Woods an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claim had not been actively pursued, the claimant had not complied with the Unless Order for further particulars, and he did not have administrator consent to continue against the third respondent.
Mr Woods did not make representations or request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore recorded that the claim was automatically dismissed on 7 July 2023 for failure to comply with the Unless Order, and added that it would have been struck out in any event because of the other failures identified in the letter.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing for this case; the short judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action separately beyond referring to 'the claims'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing for this case; the short judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action separately beyond referring to 'the claims'. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.