Case 1307323/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Corbett v Icare 24 Group and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1307323/2020
- Decision date
- 30 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs J Corbett
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mrs J Corbett's claim after a letter dated 12 October 2022 gave her an opportunity to make written representations, or request a hearing, on why strike out should not follow. The reasons say she failed to make representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and that the claim had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 7 April 2022.
The judgment does not determine the merits of the pleaded claims and records no award. It states that the claim had not been actively pursued and that the hearing fixed for 19 January 2023 would not take place. The decision is dated 30 November 2022 and signed by Employment Judge Woffenden.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records a single strike-out order and gives no separate merits findings on this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a single strike-out order and gives no separate merits findings on this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a single strike-out order and gives no separate merits findings on this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records a single strike-out order and gives no separate merits findings on this head. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.