Case 1307399/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr W Haines, Consultant — 2021
- Case reference
- 1307399/2019
- Decision date
- 28 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Panel members
- Mrs B Astill, Mr J Sharma
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final merits hearing took place in Birmingham on 25-27 January 2021 before Employment Judge Perry, Mrs B Astill and Mr J Sharma. On 28 January 2021 the tribunal recorded that Mr Stanley was not discriminated against contrary to Part 5 Equality Act 2010. His complaints of harassment and failure to make reasonable adjustments were dismissed.
The tribunal also held that the claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint was not well founded and dismissed it. The extracted judgment does not contain written reasons beyond the dispositive findings recorded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held the claimant was not discriminated against contrary to Part 5 Equality Act 2010; his complaints of harassment and failure to make reasonable adjustments were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.