Case 1307425/2020 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance For the v Mrs Daniela Dumitrascu — 2021
- Case reference
- 1307425/2020
- Decision date
- 22 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Choudry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No appearance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for two months' unpaid wages. She did not attend the remote hearing. The tribunal heard evidence from Mrs Daniela Dumitrascu and considered the respondent's documents. It found that the correct respondent was Mini Market Oltenia Limited, based on the claimant's contract, wage slips and P45, rather than Mrs Dumitrascu personally.
The tribunal found that the claimant started work on 10 January 2020 as a Sales Assistant for 20 hours per week at £8.21 per hour. Her wages were £711.56 gross per month in January and February 2020, £569.20 in March 2020, and £455.46 per month while on furlough from 1 April 2020 through June 2020. On 21 June 2020 she was asked to return to work but did not do so. The respondent's evidence was that she preferred to remain at home and look after her children while receiving Universal Credit. The tribunal also recorded the respondent's denial of the claimant's allegation about being asked to sell out-of-date products.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant had no entitlement to a further two months' pay. It found that she was paid for the whole of June 2020 and had received her statutory notice of one week. The claim therefore failed and was dismissed. The tribunal noted that the maximum damages under the relevant jurisdictional order were £25,000, but no award was made because the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim was for two months' unpaid wages, pleaded at £1,422. The tribunal found the claimant had been paid through June 2020, had no entitlement to a further two months' pay, and had received her statutory notice of one week. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.