Case 1307433/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mrs D Taylor, in person — 2020
- Case reference
- 1307433/2019
- Decision date
- 13 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Mussell, was dismissed for redundancy on 23 September 2019 after 44 years' continuous employment with the respondent, Mrs D Taylor t/a A J Virgo Monumental Masons. He brought claims for a statutory redundancy payment, three weeks' unpaid wages, and three weeks' accrued but unpaid holiday pay, heard at a preliminary hearing by telephone in Birmingham before Employment Judge Lloyd on 13 May 2020.
The respondent said she had posted an ET3 but the tribunal had no record of receipt. At the hearing she stated unequivocally that she did not defend or dispute the claimant's claims. She did not dispute the claimant's gross weekly wage of £480 or his length of service, and she apologised for the distress caused by the loss of his job and the failure to pay the sums due.
The tribunal awarded the statutory redundancy payment using the Government's online calculator and the accepted weekly pay figure of £480. It found the claimant had proved his claim for three weeks' unpaid wages and his claim for three weeks' accrued holiday pay. The amounts awarded were £14,160 for redundancy, £1,440 for unpaid wages, and £1,440 for holiday pay, producing a total award of £17,040.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £14,160 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,440 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,440 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,040
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.