Case 1307447/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Keeling-Wheat v Scalemode Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1307447/2019
- Decision date
- 5 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Keeling-Wheat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remedy hearing on 5 August 2020 before Employment Judge Mark Butler, the tribunal noted that no Rule 21 liability judgment had been entered previously. It therefore entered default judgment in favour of the claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 for the claims being brought, except for reimbursement of £150 for an outstanding fine, which was not awarded.
The tribunal quantified unpaid wages by finding that the claimant worked an average of 70.8 hours per week over a 12-week reference period, but had been paid only for 45 hours per week. On that basis, there were 25.8 unpaid hours per week for 29 weeks at £7.83 and 13 weeks at £8.21, producing an award of £8,612.04.
Holiday pay was calculated by reference to the same average weekly hours. The tribunal found that the claimant had taken 14 days' holiday, equal to 2.8 weeks of entitlement, and that pay had been calculated on a 45-hour week rather than 70.8 hours. It also found 1.7 weeks of accrued holiday outstanding on termination, and awarded £1,553.80.
For notice pay, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to one week's notice pay based on 70.8 hours at £8.21, awarding £581.27. The total gross award was £10,747.11. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had received no unemployment benefits, so recoupment did not apply, and noted that tax and national insurance would need to be accounted for if not deducted at source.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages were quantified by reference to 25.8 unpaid hours per week over 29 weeks at £7.83 and 13 weeks at £8.21. Default judgment was entered under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £8,612 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was calculated using the claimant's average weekly hours of 70.8 rather than 45 hours, with reference to holiday already taken and 1.7 weeks accrued but unpaid. | Upheld | — | £1,554 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded for one week's notice, calculated at 70.8 hours at £8.21. | Upheld | — | £581 |
| Other | Claim for reimbursement of £150 for an outstanding fine. The judgment does not identify a separate statutory label for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,747
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.