Case 1307502/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Whatley v Horizon Corporate Facilities Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1307502/2019
- Decision date
- 7 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Whatley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham, Employment Judge Flood heard the case on 4, 5, 6 and 7 May 2021. The written judgment records that the claimant, Mr D Whatley, succeeded in his complaint of constructive unfair dismissal against Horizon Corporate Facilities Limited.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the agreed sum of £4,000 in respect of the unfair dismissal, payable within 21 days. The written record does not split that sum into separate heads of loss or set out further remedy calculations.
The claimant's separate complaint of unlawful deduction of wages was found not well founded and was dismissed. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and does not provide written reasons beyond the formal outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a complaint for constructive unfair dismissal and states that it succeeds. The record does not break the £4,000 remedy into separate heads. | Upheld | — | £4,000 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint was found not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.