Case 1307503/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Wendy Adams v Lighthouse Vending Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1307503/2019
- Decision date
- 7 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beck
- Venue
- Birmingham hybrid hearing via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Wendy Adams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at a Birmingham hybrid hearing via CVP on 9 and 10 February 2021 before Employment Judge Beck sitting alone, held that Wendy Adams's complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded. It also found that Lighthouse Vending Services Limited was in breach of contract by dismissing her without notice.
The judgment did not determine remedy at that stage. The tribunal ordered the claimant to file an up-to-date schedule of loss and supporting documents by 10 March 2021, ordered the respondent to provide a counter-schedule and supporting documents by 7 April 2021, and directed that the matter be relisted for a separate remedy hearing unless the parties notified the tribunal by 7 April 2021 that no remedy hearing was required.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.