Case 1307511/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Malik v Pegasus Outsourcing — 2022
- Case reference
- 1307511/2020
- Decision date
- 21 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Malik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a judgment striking out the claim. It recorded that, by a letter dated 02 November 2022, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 17 September 2022 and 25 October 2022 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Gaskell struck out the claim on 21 November 2022. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not restate the underlying pleaded claim type; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's orders dated 17 September 2022 and 25 October 2022, had not actively pursued the claim, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 02 November 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.