Case 1307515/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A McMellon v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1307515/2019
- Decision date
- 28 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A McMellon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a postman and his employment ended on 4 May 2017 by reason of ill health early retirement. He brought a disability discrimination claim on 16 August 2019 after early conciliation on 5 and 6 August 2019. The claimant accepted that the claim was outside the three-month statutory time limit.
The tribunal found that the claimant had requested an appeal in May 2017 and that the respondent did not act on that request. The tribunal noted correspondence and discussions involving the claimant's trade union, including reference to possible tribunal proceedings by late 2018, and found that by December 2018 the claimant had been told that the appeal procedure was closed.
Considering the just and equitable extension discretion, the tribunal took account of the length and reasons for the delay, potential prejudice to both parties, and the effect of delay on evidence. It found that the respondent would face considerable prejudice because relevant witnesses had left and correspondence had gone astray, and that the claimant had not provided a satisfactory explanation for not acting earlier. The tribunal therefore declined to extend time and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination claim was dismissed at a preliminary hearing because it was presented outside the statutory time limit and the tribunal held it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s123 Equality Act 2010
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan [2018] EWCA Civ 640
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.