Case 1307523/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Kaur Budesha v Homeserve Membership Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1307523/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs Pelter, Ms Keene
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Kaur Budesha
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed between Miss H Kaur Budesha and Homeserve Membership Limited by consent. The hearing listed at Birmingham on 9 September 2020 before Employment Judge Flood, Mrs Pelter and Ms Keene was postponed to allow implementation of the settlement terms within 14 days.
The parties were given liberty to apply on or before 23 September 2020. The judgment stated that, if no application was made by that date, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed with effect from 23 September 2020.
The judgment does not make findings on the merits of the disability discrimination claim and records no monetary award or remedy breakdown.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed by consent and that, if no liberty-to-apply application was made by 23 September 2020, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed. The PDF text does not set out the factual allegations or merits. | Settled | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.