Case 1307556/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Aperture Debt Solutions LLP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1307556/2019
- Decision date
- 15 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Birmingham via CVP on 14 and 15 June 2021, Employment Judge Wedderspoon recorded that the claims of unfair dismissal were well founded and succeeded. The written record does not set out the tribunal's full reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not provided in the absence of a request.
The first claimant, Miss Shelley, was awarded £23,278, made up of a basic award of £9,975, loss of earnings of £10,948, and loss of pension of £2,355. The second claimant, Mrs Downing, was awarded £56,504.50, made up of a basic award of £10,237.50, loss of earnings of £33,787, and loss of pension of £12,480. The third claimant, Mrs Bridson, was awarded £83,488.50, made up of a basic award of £11,812.50, loss of earnings of £53,700, and loss of pension of £17,976.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Miss Shelley: total award £23,278, comprising basic award £9,975, loss of earnings £10,948, and loss of pension £2,355. | Upheld | — | £23,278 |
| Unfair dismissal | Mrs Downing: total award £56,504.50, comprising basic award £10,237.50, loss of earnings £33,787, and loss of pension £12,480. | Upheld | — | £56,505 |
| Unfair dismissal | Mrs Bridson: total award £83,488.50, comprising basic award £11,812.50, loss of earnings £53,700, and loss of pension £17,976. | Upheld | — | £83,489 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £163,271
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £32,025
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £131,246
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.