Case 1307585/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Not attending — 2021
- Case reference
- 1307585/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean Members
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs I.R. Fox, Mr M.Z. Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Birmingham by CVP on 1 October 2021 before Employment Judge Dean, with lay members Mrs I.R. Fox and Mr M.Z. Khan. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend.
The judgment records that the claimant brought a complaint of unlawful discrimination under section 13 and/or section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, or otherwise. The tribunal dismissed that complaint in full.
The extracted text does not include the tribunal’s detailed factual reasoning beyond the dismissal, and it does not record any monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant’s complaint of unlawful discrimination in breach of s13 and/or s15 of the Equality Act 2010, or otherwise, did not succeed and was dismissed. The extracted text does not set out further factual findings. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.