Case 1307635/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Adelie Foods Bidco Ltd (In Administration) and others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1307635/2020
- Decision date
- 12 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 64 consent judgment in the Birmingham Employment Tribunal. The tribunal recorded that all remaining claims against Adelie Foods Bidco Limited (In Administration) were dismissed on withdrawal, all claims against Samworth Brothers Limited were dismissed on withdrawal, and the remaining claims brought by Mr Meirion Gravell and Mr Allan Stirling against Adelie Foods Limited (In Administration) were dismissed on withdrawal. The order also stated that it did not apply to the separate claims brought by Karl Clohessy, Nasir Mohammad, and M.G. Vilcu, and it made no order for costs or fees.
For the claimants named in Schedule 2, the tribunal held that Adelie Foods Limited (In Administration) had failed to comply adequately with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. Their protective award claim under section 189 therefore succeeded. The tribunal ordered remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 1 June 2020, being the date on which the first of the dismissals to which the complaint related took effect.
The tribunal also dismissed on withdrawal all claims of failure to inform and consult under regulations 15 and 16 of TUPE 2006 and all unfair dismissal claims. It dismissed on withdrawal the statutory redundancy pay claims, notice pay claims, holiday pay claims, and claims for arrears of pay and any other payments, subject to the order preserving specified claims for certain named claimants against Adelie Foods Limited and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, which were not determined in this judgment. The text provided did not quantify the protective award in money terms.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 189 TULRCA 1992. The tribunal found Adelie Foods Limited (In Administration) failed to comply with section 188 and ordered remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 1 June 2020 for the Schedule 2 claimants only. | Upheld | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Claims under regulations 15 and 16 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | All unfair dismissal claims were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay claims were dismissed on withdrawal, except for the listed claims against Adelie Foods Limited (In Administration) and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, which were not resolved in this judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claims were dismissed on withdrawal, except for the listed claims against Adelie Foods Limited (In Administration) and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, which were not resolved in this judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claims were dismissed on withdrawal, except for the listed claims against Adelie Foods Limited (In Administration) and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, which were not resolved in this judgment. |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 64 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
- regulations 15 and 16 TUPE 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.