Case 1307650/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Ms. K. Boylin, HR Manager — 2024
- Case reference
- 1307650/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Birmingham on 4 March 2024 before Employment Judge Wedderspoon, heard Mr Samad Masood's claim against Juniper Training. The respondent was represented by Ms K. Boylin, HR Manager; the claimant appeared in person.
The judgment contains a single substantive determination: the claim of unfair dismissal was found not well founded and was dismissed. No further findings of fact, legal reasoning, or liability analysis are set out in the written record provided.
The decision note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted judgment records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.