Mrs C Nixon v Christine Sherwin — 2020

Case reference: 1307654/2019
Decision date: 9 November 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Johnson

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs C Nixon

Respondent

Christine Sherwin

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out the respondent's response after a letter dated 20 August 2020 gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the response should not be struck out. The reasons cite non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 20 August 2020 and refer to an earlier direction from Employment Judge Johnson on 21 August 2020, together with a point about the respondent and the individual insolvency register.

The judgment states that judgment is therefore entered under Rule 21. It also records that the respondent remains entitled to notice of hearings and decisions, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. No substantive liability finding or monetary award is set out in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The extracted judgment only determines that the respondent's response is struck out and that judgment is entered under Rule 21. It does not identify the underlying substantive claim or record a merits outcome for it.	Other	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.