Case 1307676/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Azaanoun v Team Telemarketing Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1307676/2023
- Decision date
- 2 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Azaanoun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs E Azaanoun brought a breach of contract complaint based on not having been given notice of termination of employment or notice pay. By letter dated 5 March 2024, the tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing on whether that complaint should be struck out for having no reasonable prospects of success, noting section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the position that she had been employed for less than a month.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason in response. The tribunal therefore struck out the breach of contract complaint concerning notice of termination or notice pay. The judgment states that this decision did not affect the claimant’s remaining complaints, which were still listed for hearing on 28, 29, 30 and 31 October 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The complaint was for breach of contract based on not being given notice of termination of employment or notice pay. The tribunal struck it out after inviting representations by letter dated 5 March 2024 and finding no acceptable reason to avoid strike out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 86
- no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.