Case 1307727/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Mall (1) Miss B Durrant (2) v Three Lions Chambers Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1307727/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Mall (1) Miss B Durrant (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented within the requisite time limit, so Employment Judge Lloyd determined the matter under Rule 21 on the available information. In the judgment dated 18 February 2020, the tribunal found that the claimants' claims for unpaid wages, breach of contract, unpaid statutory maternity pay and holiday pay were proven. The hearing listed for 27 February 2020 was vacated.
The first claimant, Miss S Mall, was awarded £1,687.50 gross. That sum comprised notice pay of £1,425.00 gross and holiday pay of £262.50 gross.
The second claimant, Miss B Durrant, was awarded £3,517.89 gross. That sum comprised unpaid wages of £2,063.19 gross and statutory maternity pay of £1,454.70 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded notice pay of £1,425.00 gross to the first claimant. | Upheld | — | £1,425 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded holiday pay of £262.50 gross to the first claimant. | Upheld | — | £263 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded unpaid wages of £2,063.19 gross to the second claimant. | Upheld | — | £2,063 |
| Other | Awarded statutory maternity pay of £1,454.70 gross to the second claimant. | Upheld | — | £1,455 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,205
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.