Case 1307812/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Stanley v Screamer Telecoms UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1307812/2019
- Decision date
- 4 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Stanley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Connolly heard the case in Birmingham on 4 March 2020 sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person. The respondent did not attend, was not represented, and had not presented a response to the claim. The tribunal therefore determined the claim under rule 47 on the material before it.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s redundancy payment claim succeeded. It also found that the respondent breached the contract of employment by failing to pay notice pay, and that the claimant was entitled to damages for that breach. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay holiday accrued but untaken at the date of termination.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £32,000.16 gross, subject to any properly payable tax and/or national insurance deductions. That sum comprised £13,650.00 for redundancy, £14,025.60 for notice pay damages, and £4,324.56 for unpaid accrued holiday. The judgment also states that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records damages for failure to pay notice pay; the remedy figure is stated as £14,025.60. | Upheld | — | £14,026 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as an unauthorised deduction from wages arising from unpaid accrued holiday at termination. | Upheld | — | £4,325 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £13,650 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £32,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.