Case 1307822/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Emeka Skerritt v Arthur Terry Learning Partnership — 2023
- Case reference
- 1307822/2022
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Emeka Skerritt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 14 April 2023, Mr Emeka Skerritt clarified that he was no longer pursuing the claims under the sex discrimination head of claim. The tribunal recorded that those sex discrimination claims were dismissed by consent on the claimant's withdrawal.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the sex discrimination allegations. Its record states that, following clarification and advice, the claimant accepted he could not pursue those claims. The respondent consented to the withdrawal on those terms.
The judgment also records that the claimant would proceed only with his remaining complaints of direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, and victimisation because of a protected act, and that those complaints remained extant. No remedy was awarded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | At a preliminary hearing on 14 April 2023, the claimant confirmed, on advice, that he could not pursue the sex discrimination claims. The tribunal recorded those claims as dismissed by consent on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.