Case 1307823/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Georgiev v Total Laser Profiles Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1307823/2022
- Decision date
- 15 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Georgiev
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment in default because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time limit. Applying Rule 21, it found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £510.00.
It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £960.00. The total sum payable was therefore £1,470.00 gross.
The judgment states that the respondent is responsible for deductions of any income tax and National Insurance contributions. The hearing listed for 20 February 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response in time. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £510.00. | Upheld | — | £510 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £960.00. | Upheld | — | £960 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,470
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.