Case 1307835/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Champion v Holland & Barrett Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1307835/2019
- Decision date
- 13 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Champion
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only complaint recorded was breach of contract. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why strike-out should not follow, but did not make any sufficient representations and did not request a hearing.
The judgment does not contain any merits findings on the underlying breach of contract issue and records no monetary award. The extracted text also contains an apparent date inconsistency in the reasons, referring to a letter dated 20 September 2022 despite the judgment date being 13 May 2022 and the sent date being 16/05/2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The reasons state that a letter dated 20 September 2022 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about strike-out for non-pursuit. That date is inconsistent with the judgment date shown in the extracted text (13 May 2022) and the sent date (16/05/2022), so the source contains an apparent date inconsistency. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.