Case 1307872/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1307872/2023
- Decision date
- 6 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Miss J Mack could not pursue the unfair dismissal complaint because she had insufficient service, having been a bank worker until October 2022. On that basis, the tribunal said it lacked jurisdiction to determine the unfair dismissal claim and dismissed it.
The separate complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was also dismissed. The tribunal found that claim was not well-founded. No award was made, as both complaints failed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant was a bank worker until October 2022 and therefore had insufficient service to bring an unfair dismissal claim; the tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to determine the complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.