Case 1307884/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds holiday-pay and breach-of-contract claims against Dane Waldron Logistics Limited
It awarded him gross damages of £2,166.67, calculated by reference to £500 per week x 52/12. The tribunal also found that Dane Waldron Logistics Limited had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday entitlement.
- Case reference
- 1307884/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Norris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, in a Rule 21 judgment, found that Mr J Norris had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of one month's notice. It awarded him gross damages of £2,166.67, calculated by reference to £500 per week x 52/12.
The tribunal also found that Dane Waldron Logistics Limited had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £600, calculated as 6 days at £100 per day. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment was £2,766.67.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of one month's notice and awarded gross damages of £2,166.67, calculated at £500 per week x 52/12. | Upheld | — | £2,167 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and awarded £600, calculated as 6 days at £100 per day. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,767
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.