Case 1307924/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Mason v M&E Aggregates Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1307924/2023
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Mason
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 15 November 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Maxwell determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure without a hearing on the merits.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,205 gross. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,330.
The total sum the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant was £4,535. The judgment is brief and does not set out detailed reasoning or apply named legal tests.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded £3,205 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages. Rule 21/22 determination following respondent's failure to present a valid response in time. | Upheld | — | £3,205 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded £1,330 for unpaid holiday entitlement. Rule 21/22 determination following respondent's failure to present a valid response in time. | Upheld | — | £1,330 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,535
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.