Case 1307929/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Fletcher (Trade Union Representative) For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1307929/2023
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Fletcher (Trade Union Representative) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing held by video at Birmingham on 2 December 2024 before Employment Judge Kenward. The judgment records that, at all material times, the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of Equality Act 2010 section 6 by reason of knee pain, disc disease, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder and depression.
The text provided does not record any substantive liability findings beyond that disability-status decision, and it does not record any remedy or award. The judgment is therefore limited to the preliminary issue of disability within the Equality Act 2010.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing finding only. The tribunal held that the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of Equality Act 2010 section 6 at all material times by reason of knee pain, disc disease, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder and depression. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Equality Act 2010 section 6
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.