Case 1307940/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Dore v IDS Transport (UK) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1307940/2023
- Decision date
- 17 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr J Reeves, Mrs D Hill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Dore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham on 15, 16 and 17 September 2025, before Employment Judge Edmonds sitting with Mr J Reeves and Mrs D Hill, the tribunal recorded that Mr T Dore's claim against IDS Transport (UK) Ltd was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The written decision is a short disposal judgment and does not set out any merits findings on the underlying allegations.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment does not record separate findings on the pleaded unfair dismissal and disability discrimination issues, and the written record is confined to the fact of withdrawal and dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records only that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; this claim type is taken from the case listing context because the judgment itself does not separate out the pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records only that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; this claim type is taken from the case listing context because the judgment itself does not separate out the pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.