Case 1308013/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person and Mr N McWalter (Father of Claimant) For the v Mr L Gray - Director — 2021
- Case reference
- 1308013/2019
- Decision date
- 12 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person and Mr N McWalter (Father of Claimant) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claim for unpaid holiday pay had been resolved and was dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive finding was made on that claim in the judgment text beyond the withdrawal following resolution.
The claimant's application to amend the proceedings so as to include commission claims for a BMW and a Honda motor vehicle was refused. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning for that refusal in the extracted text.
The remaining claims for unlawful deduction of wages and breach of contract, described as unpaid notice pay, were dismissed. The judgment does not record any award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for unpaid holiday pay had been resolved and was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unlawful deduction of wages was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim relating to unpaid notice pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.