Case 1308044/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Herbert v Mitchell’s & Butlers — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308044/2022
- Decision date
- 26 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Herbert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 20 June 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss L Herbert an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 25 January 2023 and that the case had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Meichen Date struck out the claim on 26 June 2023.
The judgment records that the hearing fixed for 29 June 2023 would not take place. It does not set out the underlying substantive complaint or any monetary remedy, and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 25 January 2023 and had not been actively pursuing the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.