Case 1308054/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Popov v Innocate Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308054/2022
- Decision date
- 3 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fitzgerald Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Popov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Popov brought claims against Innocate Ltd. At the video hearing before Employment Judge Fitzgerald on 3 February 2023, the tribunal found that the Claimant's holiday pay claim, pleaded as breach of contract, succeeded. The Respondent was ordered to pay £1,161.86, subject to any necessary deductions for tax and national insurance, and the tribunal directed that if deductions were made the Claimant was to be given a clear summary of them.
The tribunal also found in the Claimant's favour on a separate breach of contract claim relating to a Covid payment. The Respondent was ordered to pay £500 for that claim. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard procedure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the Claimant's holiday pay claim, described as a breach of contract, was successful and awarded £1,161.86. | Upheld | — | £1,162 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that the Claimant's breach of contract claim relating to a Covid payment was successful and awarded £500. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,662
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.