Case 1308066/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Dr R Grant v Dr Stefan Waldendorf, Dr Abigail Kinmond, Dr Thomas Kwan and Dr Jonathan Yin trading as Linden Hall Surgery — 2024
- Case reference
- 1308066/2023
- Decision date
- 18 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fitzgerald Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr R Grant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant's claims of disability discrimination, constructive dismissal, and detriment due to protected disclosure/whistleblowing were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The judgment also records that the claim proceeds in respect of direct sex discrimination, indirect sex discrimination, victimisation, and failure to provide a statement of particulars of employment. No written reasons, factual findings, remedy, legal tests, or lay panel members are stated in this written record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim is dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the constructive dismissal claim is dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the detriment due to protected disclosure/whistleblowing claim is dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.