Case 1308067/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms KL Barber v Marches Care Home Ltd and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 1308067/2023
- Decision date
- 17 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Appearances
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms KL Barber
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 16 July 2024 before Employment Judge Dimbylow, the tribunal recorded that, by consent, Ms Barber's claim for unfair dismissal under section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996 and her claim for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars under sections 1 to 12 Employment Rights Act 1996 were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment contains no substantive findings on liability, no findings on the merits of either claim, and no monetary award. It records that the hearing was held in private, remotely by telephone, and that the decision was sent to the parties on 17 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim under section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996; the judgment states it was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars under sections 1 to 12 Employment Rights Act 1996; the judgment states it was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.