Case 1308137/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Ramos v Mishmash Desserts Ltd R1 Mr Shahzad Ali R2 — 2025
- Case reference
- 1308137/2022
- Decision date
- 7 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Ramos
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on an application by the Respondents, Mishmash Desserts Ltd and Mr Shahzad Ali, to strike out the claim brought by Mr L Ramos. Employment Judge Quill recorded that the claim was not struck out and that the Respondents' application was refused.
The reasons section states that the tribunal had already made some case management orders and had supplied written reasons for those case management orders. The judgment says those written reasons also explained the refusal of the strike-out application.
No substantive claims were decided in this judgment, and no monetary remedy was recorded. The only outcome reflected in the text is that the claim remained on foot after the strike-out application was refused.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment concerned the Respondents' application to strike out the claim. The tribunal refused the application and stated that the claim was not struck out. No substantive liability claim was determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.