Case 1308145/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Moroney v Purple Bricks Property Limited FINAL HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 1308145/2022
- Decision date
- 7 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs DP Hill OBE, Mrs J Malatesta
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Moroney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mrs S Moroney, brought six complaints: three of direct sex discrimination and three of direct age discrimination against Purple Bricks Property Limited. The hearing took place at Birmingham on 5 to 7 February 2024 before Employment Judge Camp, Mrs DP Hill OBE and Mrs J Malatesta, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the written record, the tribunal's outcome was that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed in full. No remedy award was made and no monetary figures are recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | One of three direct sex discrimination complaints; all six complaints were dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | One of three direct age discrimination complaints; all six complaints were dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.