Case 1308153/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs Bev Duthie (2) Miss Jessica Hall v Learner Engagement Training Services Ltd FINAL HEARING FOLLOWING NON-PRESENTATION OF RESPONSE – — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308153/2022
- Decision date
- 15 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs Bev Duthie (2) Miss Jessica Hall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese were Rule 21 judgments at a final hearing on 15 May 2023 after the respondent did not appear. Employment Judge Camp found that Learner Engagement Training Services Ltd dismissed both claimants by reason of redundancy, breached contract by failing to give notice, and failed to pay compensation for accrued holiday entitlement on dismissal.
The tribunal recorded the wage figures used for each claimant's awards: Mrs Bev Duthie had annual wages of £40,000, equivalent to £767.17 per week and £153.43 per working day; Miss Jessica Hall had annual wages of £30,000, equivalent to £575.37 per week and £115.07 per working day. On that basis, Mrs Duthie was awarded £8,393.69 in total, comprising redundancy pay of £2,569.50, damages for breach of contract (notice pay) of £3,318.68, and holiday entitlement of £2,505.51. Miss Hall was awarded £6,061.83 in total, comprising redundancy pay of £2,284.00, breach of contract damages of £2,301.48, and holiday entitlement of £1,476.35.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Mrs Bev Duthie: £2,569.50; Miss Jessica Hall: £2,284.00. | Upheld | — | £4,854 |
| Breach of contract | Mrs Bev Duthie: £3,318.68 (including £250 car allowance in the notice-pay calculation); Miss Jessica Hall: £2,301.48. | Upheld | — | £5,620 |
| Holiday pay | Mrs Bev Duthie: £2,505.51; Miss Jessica Hall: £1,476.35. | Upheld | — | £3,982 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,456
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.