Case 1308381/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v BSCL Realisations Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1308381/2019
- Decision date
- 16 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent was correctly served, the administrator was granted an extension to submit a response, no response was received, and the tribunal decided the matter on written representations from the claimants' representative. The tribunal also held that, because there was no recognised trade union or employee representatives, the individual claimants had standing to bring the claim.
The tribunal found that the complaint that the first respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well-founded. It made a protective award in respect of the claimants who were employees dismissed as redundant on or after 27 June 2019, and ordered the first respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on that date. The extracted judgment does not state a monetary figure for the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment orders remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 27 June 2019, but the extracted text does not state a monetary sum. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.188 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.