Case 1308393/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Tinubu, Lay representative v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308393/2022
- Decision date
- 17 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr. Tinubu, Lay representative
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record disposes of the second and third named claimants' claims against Warwick Independent Schools Foundation. The decision was given orally at the hearing on 16 August 2023, and the written record records the outcomes only.
Sammy Tinubu's unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. His discrimination complaints were struck out because they had been brought out of time and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time.
Dusan Tinubu's unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because it was not brought in time and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have brought the claim in time. His discrimination complaints were also struck out as out of time and because it was not just and equitable to extend time. No remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Sammy Tinubu's unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Sammy Tinubu's discrimination complaints were struck out as out of time and because it was not just and equitable to extend time; the extracted text does not specify the protected characteristic. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dusan Tinubu's unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because it was not brought in time and it was reasonably practicable to have brought the claim in time. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Dusan Tinubu's discrimination complaints were struck out as out of time and because it was not just and equitable to extend time; the extracted text does not specify the protected characteristic. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not just and equitable to extend time
- reasonably practicable to have brought the claim in time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.