Case 1308405/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Augustine v Jr -v- Ruskin Properties Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1308405/2019
- Decision date
- 23 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Augustine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, by consent, the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out. The reasons given were that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and the claimant had been employed for less than two years.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant was not entitled to pursue the unfair dismissal complaint and struck it out. The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining complaints were to proceed to trial, but no findings or remedy are recorded in this decision for those other complaints.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By consent, the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and was therefore not entitled to bring such a complaint under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.