Case 1308416/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. R. Sterling v Britchem Products (UK) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1308416/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J. Jones Representation
- Venue
- Via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. R. Sterling
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs R. Sterling brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Britchem Products (UK) Limited. The case was heard via CVP on 28 and 29 October 2020 before Employment Judge J. Jones, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr G Price, Solicitor.
The tribunal recorded that the claim for unfair dismissal succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £4,370.80 by way of compensation for unfair dismissal.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No further findings or remedy breakdown were set out in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,371 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,371
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,371
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.