Case 1308418/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Fray v Job Change 2007 (West Midlands) CIC FINAL HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 1308418/2022
- Decision date
- 13 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Members
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr D McIntosh, Mr PJ Simpson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Fray
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese were combined proceedings in Birmingham before Employment Judge Camp and lay members Mr D McIntosh and Mr PJ Simpson on 13 March 2024. The judgment was by consent and records that the complaints disposed of in the judgment were dismissed upon withdrawal under rules 51 and 52.
The tribunal dismissed all and any complaints of indirect discrimination and also dismissed, upon withdrawal, the complaint of breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments relating to the claimant's grievance. The written record does not set out substantive findings on liability beyond those consent disposals.
The order made at the hearing allowed the respondent's witness, Claire O'Callaghan, to be asked questions in evidence-in-chief about whether, and if so when and how, the claimant was provided with equipment recommended by Access to Work, which was said to relate to part of the reasonable adjustments claim. The written record states that reasons for the order were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | All and any complaints of indirect discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rules 51 and 52. The extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic for this complaint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments relating to the claimant's grievance was dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rules 51 and 52. The order also refers to part of the reasonable adjustments claim concerning Access to Work equipment. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.