Case 1308453/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Horwood, Counsel, ELIPS Scheme For the v No in attendance and Response Forms not submitted — 2020
- Case reference
- 1308453/2019
- Decision date
- 6 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Horwood, Counsel, ELIPS Scheme For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Birmingham on 6 March 2020 before Employment Judge Hughes, the respondents did not attend and response forms were not submitted. The tribunal nevertheless determined the claimant's monetary claims and recorded its decision in a short judgment.
The tribunal held that Mrs L Hudson was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,252.00, being satisfied that she had taken all reasonable steps to recover that sum from the respondents. It also found her claim for unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded in respect of July and August 2019 and ordered payment of £645.70 net.
The tribunal further found the breach of contract claim, described as wrongful dismissal, well-founded and awarded £1,300.80 by way of damages, identified as twelve weeks' statutory notice pay. The total sum awarded was £5,198.50. The remaining claims were dismissed on withdrawal, but the judgment does not identify those claims individually.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal was satisfied that the claimant had taken all reasonable steps to recover the redundancy payment from the respondents. | Upheld | — | £3,252 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award related to unauthorised deductions from wages for July and August 2019. | Upheld | — | £646 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal described this as breach of contract (wrongful dismissal) and awarded damages equivalent to twelve weeks' statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,301 |
| Other | The remaining claims were dismissed on withdrawal, but the judgment does not identify them individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,199
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.