Case 1308501/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Artur Leme v La Brasserie (Kidderminster) Limited in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308501/2022
- Decision date
- 2 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Artur Leme
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Broughton issued a Rule 21 judgment on 8 August 2023, corrected on 2 October 2023, in favour of Mr Artur Leme against La Brasserie (Kidderminster) Limited in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,290.75.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's 12 weeks' notice pay and ordered £3,872.25. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay redundancy pay based on 20+ years' service and ordered £6,125. The judgment records a total monetary award of £11,288.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,290.75 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,291 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay 12 weeks' notice pay and ordered £3,872.25. | Upheld | — | £3,872 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay redundancy pay based on 20+ years' service and ordered £6,125. | Upheld | — | £6,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,288
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.