Case 1308514/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Martin v Leader CNC Technologies Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1308514/2019
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 5 March 2020 before Employment Judge Mark Butler. The written judgment records only that the claims did not succeed and were dismissed. No separate findings are set out for individual claims, and no monetary award was made.
The judgment also records that the respondent's counterclaim did not succeed and was dismissed. The note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual process.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment states only that 'the claims do not succeed and are dismissed'. This claim type is inferred from the case listing metadata, as the judgment text does not separate the individual claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written judgment states only that 'the claims do not succeed and are dismissed'. This claim type is inferred from the case listing metadata, as the judgment text does not separate the individual claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.