Case 1308522/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Duncan v Acton Banks Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308522/2022
- Decision date
- 31 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Duncan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr Duncan's unfair dismissal claim on 31 May 2023. It recorded that the claimant had not provided details of arrears of pay up to the end of his notice period, that his email of 18 May 2023 was not sufficient, and that it appeared to confuse compensation for unfair dismissal with arrears of pay.
The tribunal also noted that the claimant's earlier email of 24 February 2023 appeared to accept that there were no arrears. In those circumstances it held that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, struck it out, and closed the case. The hearing listed for 2 June 2023 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal expressly struck out the unfair dismissal claim. It also referred to arrears of pay up to the end of the notice period, but the written reasons do not separately identify an unlawful deduction claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.