Case 1308537/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Amey v Rowland Door Services Limited Heard: Midlands West (by Cloud Video Platform) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1308537/2023
- Decision date
- 16 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Power
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Amey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 16 April 2024 before Employment Judge Power sitting alone, the tribunal considered Mr R Amey's breach of contract claims against Rowland Door Services Limited and the Respondent's own contract claim. The tribunal held that the Claimant's breach of contract claim in respect of expenses payments outstanding at the termination of employment was well-founded.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay damages of £1,354.05 for that successful claim. The Claimant's separate breach of contract claim relating to commission payments was found not well-founded and was dismissed.
The Respondent's employer's contract claim was also found not well-founded and was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the decision note records the outcomes and award but does not set out further reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claimant's breach of contract claim in respect of expenses payments outstanding at termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,354 |
| Breach of contract | Claimant's breach of contract claim in respect of commission payments. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Respondent's employer's contract claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,354
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.