Case 1308584/2023 · Employment Tribunal

In Person For the v Respondent — 2025

Case reference: 1308584/2023
Decision date: 18 March 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Perry

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In Person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant brought claims for disability discrimination, sex discrimination, unpaid wages and other unspecified payments. The tribunal recorded that the claim form was presented on 6 December 2023, after ACAS early conciliation notification on 26 September 2023 and issue of the certificate on 7 November 2023.

The tribunal found that all claims had been presented outside the primary three-month time limit. For the discrimination claims, it found the most recent act complained of was still out of time even if the claims were treated as a continuing act, and it was not just and equitable to extend time because the claimant had advice available and was not shown to have been unable to seek advice or present a claim.

For the unlawful deduction from wages claim, the tribunal found it had been practicable for the claimant to present a claim significantly earlier than she did. The discrimination and unlawful deduction from wages claims were therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and the tribunal did not need to decide whether a fair trial was impossible.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Sex discrimination	Dismissed for want of jurisdiction under Section 123(1) of the Equality Act 2010 because the claim was presented outside the primary time limit and the tribunal did not find it just and equitable to extend time.	Dismissed	Sex	—
Disability discrimination	Dismissed for want of jurisdiction under Section 123(1) of the Equality Act 2010 because the claim was presented outside the primary time limit and the tribunal did not find it just and equitable to extend time.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Dismissed for want of jurisdiction under Section 23(2) and (4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because the tribunal was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.